Sex and the City- The Movie Reviewed (Small spoiler below)
Standing amongst a sea of teenage and quarter-life girls with their token gays waiting to see the midnight premiere of Sex and the City, The Movie, the cult following of four women in their forties is shocking at first. However, looking at the television series and now the movie, it makes sense that the storyline of these women has captivated so many women of all stages in our modern age.
Carrie, Miranda, Charlotte and Samantha are new archetypes of the modern woman. In a post-women’s lib world, these women depict the results of such efforts. Though the movie lacks a strong storyline, and instead crams a television season’s worth of fluff, puns and chaos into a 2.5 hour movie, it successfully presents modern women with a plethora of examples of what it can be to a be a woman.
A successful writer, lawyer, art dealer and PR rep of the Big Apple afford young women a clearer vision of career and personal growth intermixed with traditional feminine ideology of family and marriage. Increasingly, it is important for impressionable young women to realize they can have both a career and a family, if they choose. Furthermore, it is important for women of all ages to realize that it is alright if traditional feminine ideology does not suit their individual lifestyle.
This is what Samantha’s character and storyline in the movie portrays successfully. As Samantha attempts to fulfill traditional ideas of living for love, rather than solely herself, she realizes that she prefers the freedom of herself. The “me” factor. She abandons a unfulfilled and saddened life where she feels stuck at home as a traditional “housewife” in Los Angeles. The film ends with her turning 50, being single, successful and living the socialite life in New York City. The important part here is that she is happy with that and shows that this independent lifestyle is a perfectly fine selection for women. She is not punished in the storyline, like films of decades past where older, single women were treated more like old hags rather than fulfilled and happy members of society. Living to live rather than living to find a man is a pivotal pinpoint of Samantha’s character and a vital element that audience members should pick up on.
The overarching importance of a film like this, which relies on audience loyalty rather than cinematic quality and/or excellence, is the defining of a new type of womanhood, or rather the destruction of a single traditional ideal of womanhood into a flood of choices and options. Each of these options lead to differing places and viewers see the struggles, and they see the benefits. 
Sex and the City reminds viewers that being single at 30, 40 and 50 is okay and, in actuality, can be beneficial for the idea and fulfillment of one’s self. Happiness can come from more than getting married, having a child and staying at home. At the same time, it is okay to desire traditional feminine archetypes. There are options and women are empowered to create them and choose them.
Sex and the City, The Movie fulfills America’s incessant need to overindulge, going for a second helping when the final meal was more than satisfying. However, the presentation of four successful, hard working, fun women living varying lifestyles in the nation’s biggest city is imperative in a society that continues to present young women with conflicting ideas of womanhood.
Popularity: 23% [?]
Sphere: Related Content

May 30th, 2008 at 5:51 pm
incredibly eloquent insight! I think the movie was “fabulous!” Makes you feel like it’s ok to break the mold!
May 30th, 2008 at 11:47 pm
I am never going to see this movie but it is true that they represent a new direction in women’s rights (but just to clarify, the ERA never passed
)
May 30th, 2008 at 11:56 pm
I was trying to figure out a way to say a “post ERA movement,” but you are correct that the way it was written sounds as though the ERA did pass. I have since edited the content and removed this line to reduce confusion amonst readers. Thanks!
May 31st, 2008 at 2:01 am
Well, a lot of feminists just consider this the post-feminist movement
May 31st, 2008 at 3:05 pm
Great review, but I am boycotting the film – Sarah Jessica bashed Joan Crawford on MSN in a recent interview and I will have none of that! HA!
May 31st, 2008 at 3:06 pm
I never watched the series and was recently warned that I shouldn’t waste my money on the movie.
Let me ask you this, do you think most women watching the movie are thinking as “deep” as you? Unfortunately I heard that the big draw of the movie is the clothes…not the content.
May 31st, 2008 at 3:32 pm
Neil: Maybe SJP is jealous because Joan Crawford doesn’t look like a horse.
Dalia: I think on a subconscious level, women watching the film may naturally take in ideas that these women represent as they are entraced by the fashions of the film.
The one aspect of the film that I was happy with, in regards to clothes, was the idea that in the end simplicity and vintage clothing win out over designer wear!
May 31st, 2008 at 4:32 pm
Love Sex in the City meets the Golden Girls…classic!
May 31st, 2008 at 8:23 pm
Princess Bubble followers will be the single girls of 2043-but do love Golden Girls.
June 2nd, 2008 at 11:23 pm
When I was waiting in line to see the movie, I was very intrigued by how every girl in line was similar. They all talked the same, looked the same, and acted the same. It wasn’t all that surprising, but I was curious if you would see a similar audience in small towns or if it was more of a big city response. Just funny to see all the young 20 something year olds (girls and gays) in line who aspired to one day have the lifestyle of the women portrayed in the film.
June 13th, 2008 at 10:57 am
Considering Neil will not see this movie with me, I am looking for a date. I was also highly amused that the advertising-based link to the word “gay” offered me lesbian videos. Who controls that advertising??? LOL
June 25th, 2008 at 12:07 pm
I have not seen the movie, but I loved your review!! Being a career gal myself, I loved your take. It is not easy living in the post-feminist era balancing family and career, but I’ll take it over the pre-feminist era anyday!